🔗 Share this article

The last time the Russian President traveled to the South Asian nation four years ago, the global landscape looked entirely distinct. That short trip, curtailed by the pandemic, focused on talks on economic and military ties between the two leaders.

Not long after, the full-scale invasion of Ukraine would transform the Russian leader into a global pariah, significantly restricting his overseas engagements.

Additionally, that period came before a major change in ties between Washington and Delhi, marked by inflammatory statements and the imposition of substantial trade tariffs.

"In this context, the importance of this diplomatic mission to engage with the Indian PM is profound, serving as a signal of enduring ties and a defiance of external pressure," experts emphasize.

A Pivotal Moment for Two Major Powers

The summit takes place at a delicate moment. The Kremlin leader comes after rejecting recent diplomatic initiatives for Ukraine, confident due to reported gains by Russian forces.

"For Russia, the primary importance of this engagement is its very occurrence," stated a senior researcher based in Moscow. "It indicates a return to something resembling normal international relations."

From Delhi's standpoint, the stakes are even higher. The country faces a challenging international environment, characterized by a semi-isolationist United States, a weakened Russia, and an increasingly powerful China.

The tightrope walk was highlighted just before the visit, when senior Western diplomats released a joint opinion piece criticizing Russia's peace efforts. This prompted a firm response from Indian officials, who called it an inappropriate diplomatic practice.

'China Remains the Greatest Threat'

The historical partnership dates back to the Cold War era and remains deeply entrenched, with Moscow long being Delhi's primary defense supplier. This alliance was largely tolerated by the West before a recent shift.

Over time, Western nations overlooked India's large-scale buying of cheap energy from Russia. Yet, recently stalled diplomacy, accusations increased, leading to economic penalties and a major chill in transatlantic relations with Delhi.

"In response, India has returned to its traditional posture of maintaining multiple options," explained a strategic analyst. "It signals to the US that it has other choices and is waiting to see how the situation unfolds."

Apart from international politics, India's fundamental concern with Russia is its strategic location. "Beijing remains the primary security challenge to India, and for decades, India has depended on Russia as a counterweight against China," the analyst added.

The deepening Moscow-Beijing axis has raised alarms in Delhi, prompting efforts to prevent an excessively close bond between its northern neighbor and its traditional ally.

This concern has also accelerated India's drive to reduce its defense procurement, shrinking its dependence on Russian equipment from about 70% to a reduced portion in the past few years.

"India will attempt to find a middle ground: buy sufficient Russian arms to maintain the alliance, but avoid so dependent that a sudden cutoff would cripple its defenses," the analyst remarked.

The Oil Question

Enhanced trade relations is expected to be a key agenda item. President Putin has publicly emphasized plans to elevate cooperation with India to a "qualitatively new level", in spite of Western sanctions.

The matter of energy purchases remains pivotal. Although the Indian government has stated to continue buying Russian oil, new sanctions have slowed activity from the commercial buyers. At the same time, India has moved to increase imports of US energy.

A Kremlin spokesperson admitted "obstacles" in economic cooperation but insisted it would proceed without major disruption. The official downplayed the impact of sanctions, stating they would cause only "insignificant" and "brief" disruptions and that Russia possesses the "means" to circumvent them.

Diplomatic Constraints

As talks proceed, the issue of Ukraine is expected to be addressed mainly through India's consistent appeal for a peaceful resolution.

"While the Indian leader has access to both sides, the nation lacks the necessary leverage to significantly influence the conflict," the analyst noted. "Beyond urging negotiations, its ability to effect change is limited."

Ultimately, notwithstanding the visible friendship between the two leaders, the relationship is fundamentally one of "pure realpolitik," driven by cold calculation in a volatile world.